In a pointed column for the New York Post, veteran journalist and conservative commentator Michael Goodwin lashed out at what he characterized as a persistent pattern of political hostility from progressive media outlets. Focused on the solemn anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks, Goodwin’s piece argued that instead of observing a day of unified national mourning and honoring the victims, elements of the left-wing media establishment deliberately utilized the milestone to launch calculated political attacks against Donald Trump and conservative leadership.
Goodwin’s commentary centers on the idea that major progressive publications and media platforms consistently weaponize historical anniversaries to push specific ideological narratives.
Rather than allowing the nation to reflect on the tragedy and resilience shown in the aftermath of 2001, Goodwin contends that these media organizations chose division by reviving old grievances and framing contemporary political debates through a lens hostile to the right.
He expressed frustration that solemn moments meant to transcend partisan divides are increasingly co-opted for daily political combat.
The column highlights a broader, ongoing friction within American media culture regarding how historical events are interpreted and remembered. Critics of Goodwin’s perspective often argue that examining past policy decisions, societal impacts, and political rhetoric—even on solemn anniversaries—is a necessary component of public discourse and accountability.
However, Goodwin and his supporters view such timing as cynical, arguing it demeans the dignity of national remembrance days and deepens cultural polarization.
Ultimately, Goodwin’s article serves as a reflection on the state of modern American media, where even sacred national anniversaries cannot escape the gravitational pull of partisan politics. By framing the coverage as a deliberate “smear campaign,” the commentary captures the deep-seated distrust and ideological warfare that continues to define the relationship between conservative commentators and mainstream progressive media outlets.
